The Rapid Evolution of Knowledge in the Information Age

By Sean Connick | Published: 13th June 2025

In science and education, change is the only constant. What we know – or think we know – can shift dramatically with new discoveries and insights. A vivid example is the BBC’s landmark documentary series Walking With Dinosaurs. When it first aired in 1999, this series represented the cutting edge of paleontological knowledge. Its lifelike CGI dinosaurs amazed viewers and reflected the best scientific understanding of the time. Yet just over twenty years later, many of its portrayals have become outdated, highlighting how quickly knowledge progresses. In today’s information age, discoveries are made faster than ever, and learners have unprecedented access to the latest information. This article explores how our understanding of dinosaurs (and other fields) has evolved over two decades, and how modern technology makes learning far more fluid and dynamic than in the past.

Twenty Years of Change: From Walking With Dinosaurs to Today

When Walking With Dinosaurs debuted, it was celebrated for bringing dinosaurs “stomping and roaring” into living rooms with scientific authenticity. The creators consulted experts and based the depictions on the fossil evidence available in the late 1990s. For example, the show’s fearsome predators and towering herbivores were shown with the scaly, reptilian skin that was then the accepted image of dinosaurs. This was the state-of-the-art view in 1999, and for many viewers it was a thrilling education in prehistory.

However, science has not stood still. In the intervening decades, paleontologists have made major breakthroughs. Roughly 50 new dinosaur species have been discovered each year since 1999. Powerful new tools – from high-resolution imaging to computer simulations – have allowed scientists to reconstruct dinosaurs’ appearance and behavior with greater accuracy. As a result, our picture of these ancient creatures has changed in significant ways.

One of the most striking changes is the understanding that many dinosaurs were feathered. Back in the 1990s, only a handful of fossil specimens hinted at feathers on dinosaurs, and these finds were poorly preserved and not widely known. The public (and even many scientists) simply “wasn’t ready” to envision fluffy or feathered dinosaurs at that time. The original Walking With Dinosaurs thus depicted virtually all its creatures without feathers – even species like raptors that, as we now know, almost certainly had feathery coats.

Today’s fossil evidence for feathers is overwhelming. Dozens of dinosaur species – from small raptors to giant tyrannosaurs – have been definitively identified with feathers, and experts confidently infer feathered plumage in hundreds of other species based on their evolutionary family ties. This pushes the origin of feathers much deeper down the dinosaur family tree than previously thought. In short, feathers were likely the norm, not the exception, among dinosaurs, contrary to the all-scaly creatures seen in the 1999 series.

Scientists now believe feathers served various purposes for dinosaurs – insulation for warmth or eggs, display for attracting mates, and eventually the basis for flight. The feather evidence has even strengthened theories that some dinosaurs were warm-blooded and further solidified the now-standard view that birds evolved directly from dinosaurs. Other aspects of dinosaur life have been reimagined as well: we now have evidence of dinosaurs living in Arctic climates with months of darkness, bizarre new species like the sail-backed, duck-billed Deinocheirus have been discovered, and the debate continues over how some species (like Spinosaurus) may have taken to a semi-aquatic lifestyle. All these findings paint a far richer and more complex picture than what was available twenty years ago.

Crucially, these rapid advances are being conveyed to the public. In 2025, the BBC even launched an updated series of Walking With Dinosaurs incorporating the latest science. Viewers can now see on screen what was absent in 1999 – feathered raptors darting across the landscape, polar dinosaurs enduring long winters, and an ever-expanding menagerie of strange Mesozoic creatures previously unknown. The contrast between the original series and our current understanding is a testament to how quickly scientific knowledge can evolve. A concept that was once speculative or unknown (like feathered

dinos) can become common knowledge within a generation.

The Dynamic Nature of Knowledge Across Fields

Paleontology is just one example. All scientific fields have seen their share of transformative changes over the past few decades – changes that often render yesterday’s “textbook truths” incomplete or obsolete. The key lesson is that knowledge is not static; it’s continuously refined as new evidence emerges. In other words, we should expect updates and even outright reversals in our understanding as research progresses. This is a feature, not a bug, of the scientific process.

Consider astronomy: when many of today’s adults were in school, they learned that the Solar System has nine planets, with Pluto as the ninth. That was accepted science for 75 years. Then, in 2006, Pluto was famously reclassified as a “dwarf planet,” and suddenly textbooks and mnemonics needed revision. Students and teachers had to adapt to a new reality of eight planets. Not long after, even the category “dwarf planet” was refined (leading to terms like “plutoid”) as astronomers discovered more Pluto-sized objects in the solar system. This abrupt change caused some confusion and debate – but it ultimately provided a teachable moment. Educators highlighted Pluto’s story to illustrate the self-correcting, dynamic nature of science, showing that scientific classifications can change as we gather new data. What we see in hindsight is that science wasn’t “wrong” before; it was simply based on the best information available, and it improved with new evidence.

The field of medicine offers another dramatic example. Medical knowledge has grown so rapidly that it’s often said to have a short “half-life.” In 1950, it was estimated that it took about 50 years for medical knowledge to double; by 1980, it doubled in just 7 years, and by 2010 in roughly 3.5 years. In fact, by 2020, medical information was projected to double in a matter of months – as little as 73 days by one estimate! This means that many practices doctors learned in school can become outdated within a few years of graduation. A striking case is how treatment guidelines changed: for instance, giving beta-blocker drugs to heart failure patients was once considered malpractice, until studies in the 1970s showed it actually improved survival – turning an old rule on its head. Such turnabouts underscore that continuous learning is essential even for seasoned professionals. Doctors now rely on up-to-the-minute research summaries and decision-support tools to keep current, because staying static could harm patients. The concept of a fixed medical curriculum has given way to an expectation of lifelong learning, where clinicians regularly “unlearn” outdated practices and adopt new ones as evidence warrants.

An Explosion of Information and Connectivity

What is driving these rapid changes? Part of the answer lies in the sheer explosion of information in the modern era. Experts often talk about the “knowledge doubling curve,” a term coined by futurist Buckminster Fuller. Until around 1900, human knowledge was estimated to double only about once every century. By the mid-20th century, knowledge was doubling every 25 years. Today, it doubles every 13 months, and some predictions suggest even faster rates in the near future.

Digital technology, open-access publishing, real-time collaboration tools, and the global Internet have removed traditional barriers to learning. Learners of all ages now have access to unprecedented resources – from cutting-edge scientific journals to interactive simulations and AI tutoring systems.

However, this flood of information requires new skills. Learners must develop critical thinking, information literacy, and the ability to adapt to constant change. These are becoming the hallmarks of education in the 21st century.

Learning in a More Fluid World

Learning is no longer about memorizing static facts; it’s about cultivating the ability to continuously update and apply knowledge in context. The digital revolution means learners can access high-quality content anytime, anywhere. Schools and universities are beginning to shift from rote learning toward fostering agility, adaptability, and independent inquiry.

Looking Ahead: Real-Time Learning and Evolving Assessments

As we look to the future, the pace of change in learning is only set to accelerate. With advancements in artificial intelligence, wearable devices, and augmented reality, learners will soon have real-time access to the latest research and data wherever they are. AI-driven platforms will be able to push personalized, up-to-date content based on individual learning paths and goals. Learning will not just be fast – it will be continuous and embedded into daily life.

Imagine a student studying biology who receives real-time updates about a newly discovered gene function the moment it’s published in a scientific journal. Or a language learner who gets instant feedback from an AI companion that adjusts to their tone and vocabulary use. These technologies are already emerging, and they promise a world where learning and information are intertwined with everyday activity, always accessible and responsive to individual needs.

This shift will also demand a rethinking of traditional assessment tools. Standardized tests and static exams, which often reward memorization of fixed content, will need to evolve. In a world where knowledge changes rapidly and is easily searchable, the emphasis will move toward evaluating how well learners can apply knowledge, think critically, adapt to new situations, and synthesize information from multiple sources.

Future assessments may be more project-based, collaborative, and dynamic, reflecting real-world problem solving rather than isolated facts. Metrics may include digital portfolios, interactive simulations, or AI-monitored skill demonstrations. These changes will better reflect the kind of learning and thinking required in a fast-changing world – one where how we learn matters more than what we memorized.

Conclusion

The evolution of Walking With Dinosaurs – from its 1990s portrayal of scaly giants to today’s feathered, nuanced reconstructions – is a microcosm of a broader truth: knowledge is always advancing. Over just twenty years, our scientific understanding of dinosaurs has been profoundly reshaped, and similar revolutions have occurred in many other fields. Thanks to the information age, these changes propagate faster than ever, reaching learners worldwide almost instantly.

For today’s learners, this means education is not a one-time event but a lifelong journey. It means that what is “true” today might be refined tomorrow – and that’s okay. We now have the tools to keep learning continuously, updating our mental models with each new discovery.

In summary, we live in an era where information grows at lightning speed and can be shared globally in an instant. This makes learning more dynamic and fluid than ever before. It is a thrilling time to be a learner. The challenge and opportunity for all of us is to remain curious, adaptable, and open-minded. If we can do that, we’ll not only keep up with the quickening evolution of knowledge – we’ll thrive in it.

Key Dates:

• Applications close: Tuesday, 30 September

• Judging period: 2–15 October

• Award ceremony: Friday, 24 October

Enter Now

Think you’ve got what it takes to win? Enter now for a chance to showcase your product, gain industry recognition.

2025 Categories

References

• Devlin, H. (2025). Arctic, feathered … or just weird: what have we learned since Walking with Dinosaurs aired 25 years ago. The Guardian.

• Naish, D. (2021). Reminiscing About Walking With Dinosaurs, Part 1. Tetrapod Zoology.

• Bryner, J. (2008). Pluto’s Identity Crisis Hits Classrooms and Bookstores. Space.com.

• Kelly, D. (2023). Medical Knowledge Half-Life: What is it and why does it matter?. Eolas Medical.

• Schilling, D. R. (2013). Knowledge Doubling Every 12 Months, Soon to be Every 12 Hours. Industry Tap.

• The Internet’s Impact on Education: Transforming Learning in the Digital Age. eLearning Industry (2023).

• Hennessy, J. (2002). Embracing the Need to ‘Learn and Relearn’. Stanford Magazine.